Riley v. U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Shemeika Riley
Defendant: U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2024cv01123
Filed: August 19, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Jerry Edwards
Referring Judge: Kayla D McClusky
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie Olszewski on behalf of U S Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attorney Natalie Olszewski added to party U S Commissioner Social Security Administration(pty:dft)) (aty,Olszewski, Natalie)
August 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for appearance of Bryan Konoski for Shemeika Riley. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 8/20/2024. (crt,Thomas, T)
August 20, 2024 Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER issued. (crt,Thomas, T)
August 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 8/20/2024. (jud,McClusky, Kayla)
August 20, 2024 SERVICE of Complaint on the Commissioner of Social Security through the United States Attorney's Office by the Courts electronic case management system pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security actions Under 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g). U S Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 8/20/2024, answer due 10/21/2024. (crt,Thomas, T)
August 19, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION for Bryan Konoski to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Admission fee: $105, receipt number ALAWDC-6032620) by Shemeika Riley. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 8/19/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order, #2 Certificate of good standing)(aty,Lucius, Harold)
August 19, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shemeika Riley. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 8/19/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(aty,Lucius, Harold)
August 19, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U S Commissioner Social Security Administration (In Forma Pauperis status requested and/or granted) filed by Shemeika Riley. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Harold Dean Lucius, Jr added to party Shemeika Riley(pty:pla))(aty,Lucius, Harold)
August 19, 2024 CASE Assigned to Judge Jerry Edwards, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (crt,Bunting, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riley v. U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Shannon Thornhill Smitherman
Represented By: Natalie Olszewski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shemeika Riley
Represented By: Harold Dean Lucius, Jr
Represented By: Bryan Konoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?