Lewis v. Bossier Parish et al
| Freddie R Lewis |
| Shelton, Mark Toloso, Weaver, Lee, Stokes, Sheriffs Dept Bossier Parish, Bossier Parish, George Henderson, Griffin, Orr, Hawn, Steve Broadensky, David, Larry Dean, Hall, Haverton, Jones, Martin, J Martin, Parish, Pierce, Porter, Prather, Robert Russell, Thornhill and Wadsworth |
| 5:2007cv00394 |
| March 1, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Bossier |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Tom Stagg |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
JUDGMENT IT IS ORDERED that all remaining claims in this civil action are dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute Signed by Judge Tom Stagg on 12/3/10. (crt,Davis, C)
|
|
Filing
55
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint and 14 Amended Complaint,, filed by Freddie R Lewis: IT IS RECOMMENDED that the following claims be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted: (1) Claims against Sgt. Shelton, the Bossier City Police Department, and the Bossier City Police Chief arising out of his November 18, 2005 arrest; (2) Claims against the Parish of Bossier arising out of his November 19, 2005 transfer; (3) Claims aga inst Medical Assistant Thornhill and Medical Assistant David arising out of his November 19, 2005 request for medical treatment; (4) Claims against Warden Weaver, Assistant Warden Stokes, Sgt. Wadsworth, Sgt. Jones, Deputy Pierce, Deputy Porter, and Deputy Martin arising out of denial of access to the courts while at Bossier Parish Maximum Security Facility from November 10, 2005 until February 22, 2005; (5) Claims against Deputy Porter and Deputy Martin arising out of the search of his cell whi le incarcerated at the Bossier Parish Maximum Security Facility from November 10, 2005 until February 22, 2005; (6) Claims against Warden Weaver, Assistant Warden Stokes, Medical Officer Thornhill, and Medical Officer David arising out of his Februar y 20, 2006 medical examination; (6) Claims against Assistant Warden Stokes arising out of the February 22, 2006 confrontation; (7) Claims against Medical Assistant Broadenski arising out of his February 24, 2005 medical visit; (8) Claims against the Bossier Parish Sheriff's Department and the Bossier City Police Department arising out of his classification claims; (9) Claims against Sgt. Wadsworth, Sgt. Jones, Deputy Martin, Deputy Porter, Deputy Pierce, Warden Dennis Weaver and Assistant W arden Stokes arising out of the denial of access to the courts; (10) Claims against George Henderson; (11) Claims against Assistant Warden Lee arising out of the prison disciplinary proceedings; (12) Claims against Assistant Warden Lee arising out of the prison administrative grievance procedure; (13) Claims against Judge Stinson, Judge Bolin, Judge Robinson and Magistrate Judge Robert Shemwell; (14) Claims against Mary Jackson; (15) Claims against the District Attorney; and (16) Claims against Agent T. Smith, Officer M. Teutsch, Deputy Hall and Deputy Prather. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's civil rights claim seeking monetary compensation for his allegedly unconstitutional conviction and/or sentence be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) until such time as the Heck conditions are met. Objections to R&R due by 3/11/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Hornsby on 2/22/10. (crt,Cassanova, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
