Conner v. Kraemer Shows Oilfield Services L L C
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 30, 2013
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 65 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b). Signed by Judge Tom Stagg on 8/27/2013. (crt,Dauterive, C)
|June 11, 2013
MEMORANDUM RULING: IT IS ORDERED that 46 motion for summary judgment filed by Exco Resources Inc. is hereby GRANTED. All claims by Michael Conner against Exco are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Tom Stagg on 6/10/2013. (crt,Joffrion, B)
|October 4, 2012
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 4 First MOTION to Remand filed by Michael Conner, 22 Memorandum Ruling Regarding Motion to Remand, and 24 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Judge re 23 Order on Motion to Remand filed by Exco Re sources Inc. The Memorandum Ruling (Doc 22 ) is VACATED, the Motion to Remand (Doc No 4 ) is DENIED, and the Appeal (Doc No 24 ) is TERMINATED AS MOOT. The court will set a scheduling conference in the near future to discuss a trial date and related deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 10/04/12. (crt,Yocum, M)
|July 9, 2012
MEMORANDUM RULING re 4 First MOTION to Remand filed by Michael Conner. The Motion to Remand is granted and, subject to the stay set forth in the accompanying order, the case is remanded to the 42nd Judicial District Court, DeSoto Parish, Louisiana, where it was pending as Civil Action No. 73194. The 11 MOTION to Strike filed by Exco Resources Inc is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 7/9/2012. (crt,Dauterive, C)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?