Dunahoe et al v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co et al
| Acey B Dunahoe and Celeste Dunahoe |
| Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co, State Farm Fire & Casualty Co, Onyx Services Inc and Austin P Tate |
| 5:2014cv00085 |
| January 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| Elizabeth E Foote |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 60 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs' claims against Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London's are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 9/9/2016. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 36 MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaintfiled by Acey B Dunahoe, Celeste Dunahoe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 12/09/2015. (crt,Williams, L)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Progressive will be allowed until February 24, 2014 to file an Amended Notice of Removal and attempt to satisfy its burden of demonstrating a basis for diversity jurisdiction. The court will review the case after the deadline and determine whether Progressive has met its burden or the case must be remanded. Compliance Deadline set for 2/24/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 2/4/14. (crt,Kennedy, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
