Dennis v. Collins, II et al
| Yolanda Dennis |
| Ernest Collins, II, Greyhound Lines Inc and National Union Fire Insurance Co of Pittsburgh PA |
| 5:2015cv02410 |
| September 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| Karen L Hayes |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM RULING re 37 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Ernest Collins, II, Greyhound Lines Inc, National Union Fire Insurance Co of Pittsburgh PA. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 11/09/2016. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion to Compel; granting 35 Motion for Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED that within the next seven days, defendant designate a Rule 30(b)(6) representative on the topics noticed by plaintiff, and the deposition take place within the next 21 days, unless the parties mutually agree to take the deposition beyond the deadline. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the written discovery component of the motion is DENIED, as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that De fendants and/or their counsel remit the sum of $300 to plaintiff, via her counsel, within the next seven days and file proof of payment in the record within seven days thereafter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 9/19/16. (crt,Crawford, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
