Pipkins et al v. Cox
Renee Pipkins, Everitt Pipkins, Theron Jackson, LaWhitney Johnson and Adriana Thomas |
Dale G Cox |
5:2015cv02722 |
November 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Shreveport Office |
Caddo |
Dee D Drell |
Mark L Hornsby |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 167 MEMORANDUM RULING re 147 MOTION to Strike Inadmissible Evidence re 143 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by James E Stewart, Sr, 152 MOTION to Strike Exhibits 146-1, 146-2, and 146-3 re 146 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Kimberly Horton, Darryl Carter, Theron Jackson, 148 DAUBERT MOTION and Objection to Dr. Diamond and Dr. Kaiser and Opinion Report filed by James E Stewart, Sr, 132 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by James E Stewart, Sr. Signed by Judge Dee D Drell on 9/23/2022. (crt,Roaix, G) (Main Document 167 replaced on 9/23/2022) (Roaix, G). |
Filing 103 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents 96 is granting in part and denying in part. Defendants shall supplement their responses to discovery in accordance with this order no later than April 29, 2021. See Memorandum Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 4/15/2021. (crt,Keller, J) |
Filing 62 MEMORANDUM RULING re 20 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by James E Stewart, Sr. Signed by Judge Dee D Drell on 4/1/2019. (crt,Roaix, G) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.