Jones v. Supreme Court et al
| Hersy Jones, Jr |
| LA State Supreme Court, LA Attorney Disciplinary Board, Robert S Kennedy and Charles B Plattsmier |
| 5:2015cv02766 |
| December 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM RULING re 59 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint with consent sought but not yet obtained filed by Hersy Jones, Jr, 57 MOTION for Reconsideration re 55 Memorandum Ruling,, 56 Judgment, filed by Hersy Jones, Jr. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 8/28/2017. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM RULING re 7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Robert S Kennedy, Charles B Plattsmier, 12 MOTION to Dismiss The Louisiana Disciplinary Board filed by LA Attorney Disciplinary Board, 33 MOTION to Dismiss filed by LA State Supreme Court, 17 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by Hersy Jones, Jr, 34 MOTION to Set Aside Default filed by LA State Supreme Court, 44 MOTION for Reconsideration re 43 Order on Motion for Leave to File filed by Hersy Jones, Jr. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 3/29/2017. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 24 MOTION for Recusal filed by Hersy Jones, Jr. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 08/19/2016. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
