Wortham v. Thompson

Plaintiff: Mattavious Qwaurtez Wortham
Defendant: Jeff R Thompson
Case Number: 5:2016cv01182
Filed: August 16, 2016
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Shreveport Office
County: Claiborne
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: S Maurice Hicks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 20, 2017 10 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendations, denying and dismissing Plaintiff's civil rights complaint with prejudice as frivolous. The Clerk of Court is instructed to send a copy of this Judgment to the keeper of the Three Strikes List in Tyler, Texas. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 03/20/2017. (crt,McDonnell, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wortham v. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mattavious Qwaurtez Wortham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff R Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?