Campbell v. Vannoy
John Henry Campbell |
Darrel Vannoy |
5:2016cv01465 |
October 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Shreveport Office |
West Feliciana |
Elizabeth E Foote |
Karen L Hayes |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendations re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Henry Campbell. IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED and DISMISSED as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 8/25/2017. (crt,Keifer, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Campbell v. Vannoy | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: John Henry Campbell | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Darrel Vannoy | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.