Mark Doyle Construction L L C et al v. Tri H M Foundation L L C et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 13, 2017
MEMORANDUM ORDER: The amended answer alleges Harris is a limited partner but it does not allege there are no other partners as was previously suggested. It implies there may be other partners which requires clarification. First Standard Asurety L L P is directed to move for leave to again amend its answer and state with specificity the name of each partner in the entity. If David Harris is the sole partner then that should be stated with specificity and it should be explained by reference to Georgia law or particular facts. The deadline for compliance with this order is 11/30/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 11/13/2017. (crt,Putch, A)
|August 29, 2017
MEMORANDUM ORDER. Plaintiffs should file another amended complaint or formal submission that sets forth the necessary facts. The court will set a scheduling conference to discuss scheduling a resolution of the merits. The jurisdiction issue must receive priority and be resolved at an early stage of the proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 8/29/2017. (crt,Keller, J)
|May 25, 2017
MEMORANDUM ORDER: An amended complaint and additional information about the amount in controversy are required. The amended complaint needs to set forth the state in which each individual party was domiciled at the time the complaint was filed. Plain tiffs will also be required to explain in a memorandum how the amount in controversy element has been met. If the amended complaint and memorandum demonstrate that there is diversity jurisdiction, the court will proceed with the scheduling of this case. Otherwise, the complaint may have to be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 5/25/2017. (crt,Keller, J)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?