Miller v. Under Armour Retail of Louisiana L L C
Shanna Miller |
Under Armour Retail of Louisiana L L C |
5:2018cv00148 |
February 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Shreveport Office |
Acadia |
Mark L Hornsby |
S Maurice Hicks |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM ORDER re 7 Amended Notice of Removal filed by Under Armour Retail of Louisiana L L C. Under Armour will be allowed one final opportunity to file an amended notice of removal by March 2, 2018 and attempt to meet its burden of e stablishing complete diversity. If it fails to do so on that third opportunity, the court will remand the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court expects that the lawyers involved in a case will read the court's orders, in full, and comply with those orders, in full. Compliance Deadline set for 3/2/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 2/16/2018. (crt,Keller, J) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM ORDER re 1 Notice of Removal filed by Under Armour Retail of Louisiana L L C. The notice of removal does not adequately allege Under Armour's own citizenship, so Under Armour will need to file an amended notice of removal by February 26, 2018 and set forth the necessary information. Compliance Deadline set for 2/26/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 2/12/2018. (crt,Keller, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.