Strange v. Doe #1 et al
Clinton Strange |
John Doe #2, John Doe #1 and Prospect America Inc |
5:2019cv01096 |
August 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Mark L Hornsby |
Donald E Walter |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Prospect America Inc (crt,Jones, P) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Prospect America Inc with Jury Demand filed by Clinton Strange. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(crt,Jones, P) |
Filing 5 REMARK: subpoena mailed to plaintiff on 8/26/2019. (crt,JonesSld, P) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Discovery, clerk will issue Rule 45 subpoenas requested and provide them to Plaintiff, who must serve the subpoenas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 8/26/2019. (crt,JonesSld, P) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to John Doe #1, John Doe #2 (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Expedited Discovery by Clinton Strange. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,JonesSld, P) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe #1, John Doe #2 with Jury Demand (Receipt number 54635062247, filing fee $400) filed by Clinton Strange. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Letter, #4 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Donald E Walter and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.