Ceasar v. Woodforest Bank et al
Plaintiff: Sanctioned/Barred R Ceasar
Defendant: Woodforest Bank and Tele-Check Services of Houston
Case Number: 5:2020cv00344
Filed: March 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: S Maurice Hicks
Referring Judge: Mark L Hornsby
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2020 Filing 7 FEE LETTER requesting payment of appeal filing fee sent to R Ceasar re #6 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis)(crt,WalkerSld, B)
April 30, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Order that the Complaint be stricken from the record and this case closed by R Ceasar. FEE STATUS: NOT PAID (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,WalkerSld, B)
April 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fees and costs as ordered by this Court in #3 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, ORDERED that #1 Complaint be stricken from the record and this case closed. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 4/22/2020. (crt,McDonnell, D)
April 21, 2020 Filing 4 PROPOSED ORDER re #1 Complaint, #3 Memorandum Order, Referred to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 4/21/2020. (crt,Mitchell, P)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff R. Ceasar pay fees and costs owed in the prior suit (6:04-cv-00391) totaling $14,498.62 as well as the filing fee of $400.00 in this case within 30 days from the date of this order. FAILURE TO PAY THE FEES AND COSTS IN THE PRIOR SUIT (6:04-cv-00391) AND THE FILING FEES IN THIS CASE WILL RESULT IN THE COMPLAINT BEING STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD AND THIS CASE CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 3/19/2020. (crt,Keifer, K)
March 18, 2020 Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER re #1 Complaint Referred to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 3/18/2020. (crt,Mitchell, P)
March 16, 2020 CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Thigpen, M)
March 16, 2020 Filing 1 STRICKEN - COMPLAINT against Tele-Check Services of Houston, Woodforest Bank with Jury Demand filed by R Ceasar. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Civil cover sheet)(crt,Jones, P) Modified on 4/22/2020 (McDonnell, D).
March 16, 2020 DIVISIONAL TRANSFER of Old Case Number 2:20-cv-00344 from Lake Charles Division to Shreveport Division. New Case Number 5:20-cv-00344. (crt,Jones, P)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ceasar v. Woodforest Bank et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Woodforest Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tele-Check Services of Houston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sanctioned/Barred R Ceasar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?