Fields v. Cintas Corp #2
Michael W. Fields, Jr and Michael W Fields, Jr |
CINTAS CORP. NO. 2 d/b/a CINTAS UNIFORM SERVICES doing business as Cintas Uniform Services and Cintas Corp #2 doing business as Cintas Uniform Services |
5:2021cv00248 |
February 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
S Maurice Hicks |
Kayla D McClusky |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY issued by the Clerk. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes no longer assigned to case. Any pending motions and deadlines or hearings previously set before Magistrate Judge Hayes are hereby reset before Magistrate Judge McClusky. All future filings should bear the name of the new judge assignment. Approved by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 2/23/2021. (crt,Reeves, T) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cintas Corp #2. (crt,Miletello, A) |
CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cintas Corp #2 with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-4556437) filed by Michael W Fields, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Nelson Welch Cameron added to party Michael W Fields, Jr(pty:pla))(aty,Cameron, Nelson) Modified on 2/1/2021 to modify docket text (Miletello, A). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.