Johnson v. Farris
Plaintiff: Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant: Rick Farris
Case Number: 5:2022cv00319
Filed: January 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth E Foote
Referring Judge: Joseph H L Perez-Montes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff allowed 30 days to pay the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 3/25/2022. (crt,Taylor, L)
March 17, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kareem Abdul Johnson. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 3/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order, #2 Envelope)(crt,Taylor, L)
March 7, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Kareem Abdul Johnson. Clerk updated plaintiff's address to 1151 Kenneth Ave, Shreveport, LA 71103. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K)
February 25, 2022 Filing 7 LETTER from Plaintiff to Court entitled "Memorandum in Support of the Deficiencies". (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (crt,Haik, K)
February 22, 2022 Filing 6 LETTER from Kareem Johnson to Court regarding mail sent to Western District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit/mail log, #2 Envelope) (crt,Haik, K)
February 11, 2022 Filing 5 DEFICIENT? MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kareem Abdul Johnson. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (Missing accounts officer page. Clerk resent page 6 of ifp application for completion.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit filing fee or a completed IFP application. ( Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 3/9/2022). Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 2/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 ifp form)(crt,Haik, K)
February 3, 2022 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 2/3/2022. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph)
February 1, 2022 Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 2/1/2022. (crt,Devillier, W)
January 31, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kareem Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Chavis, J)
January 31, 2022 CASE Assigned to Judge Elizabeth E Foote and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Devillier, W)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Farris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kareem Abdul Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rick Farris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?