Johnson v. Farris
Kareem Abdul Johnson |
Rick Farris |
5:2022cv00319 |
January 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Elizabeth E Foote |
Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER denying #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff allowed 30 days to pay the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 3/25/2022. (crt,Taylor, L) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kareem Abdul Johnson. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 3/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order, #2 Envelope)(crt,Taylor, L) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Kareem Abdul Johnson. Clerk updated plaintiff's address to 1151 Kenneth Ave, Shreveport, LA 71103. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
Filing 7 LETTER from Plaintiff to Court entitled "Memorandum in Support of the Deficiencies". (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (crt,Haik, K) |
Filing 6 LETTER from Kareem Johnson to Court regarding mail sent to Western District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit/mail log, #2 Envelope) (crt,Haik, K) |
Filing 5 DEFICIENT? MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kareem Abdul Johnson. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (Missing accounts officer page. Clerk resent page 6 of ifp application for completion.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit filing fee or a completed IFP application. ( Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 3/9/2022). Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 2/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 ifp form)(crt,Haik, K) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 2/3/2022. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 2/1/2022. (crt,Devillier, W) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kareem Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Chavis, J) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Elizabeth E Foote and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Devillier, W) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Farris | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kareem Abdul Johnson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rick Farris | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.