Hodges v. Prator et al
| Chaves Hodges |
| Steve Prator, Deputy Bailey, Rick Farris, M Anderson and R Dibler |
| 5:2022cv06060 |
| November 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial Filing Fee due in the amount of $56.37. It is further ordered that plaintiff make payments of 20 percent of income for preceding month until $350.00 has been paid in full. Clerk manually noticed Prison Accounts Officer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 12/7/2022. (crt,Haik, K)
|
| CASE Assigned to Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chaves Hodges. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 11/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Lemoine, N) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/7/2022: #2 Proposed order) (Devillier, W). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against M Anderson, Bailey, R Dibler, Rick Farris, Steve Prator with Jury Demand filed by Chaves Hodges. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibits, #3 Envelope)(crt,Lemoine, N) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
