Bentley v. L C M Corp et al
| Richard C Bentley |
| L C M Corp and Danny R Hubbard, II |
| 6:2008cv01017 |
| July 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Contract: Other Office |
| St. Martin |
| Tucker L Melancon |
| Mildred E Methvin |
| Defendant |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM RULING re 130 MOTION for Reconsideration re 128 Memorandum Ruling, 129 Order on Motion filed by Richard C Bentley. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 3/2/2011. (crt,Alexander, E) Modified date of filing on 3/3/2011. (Alexander, E)
|
|
Filing
128
MEMORANDUM RULING re 87 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Danny R Hubbard, II, 126 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 123 Report and Recommendations. For the following reasons, this Court AFFIRMS the discovery sanction awarded against plaintiff in favor of Mr. Gary McGoffin, and further concludes this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the claims of the plaintiff. Accordingly, the instant action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Considering the foregoing, this Court concludes the plaintiff has failed to sustain his burden of showing he has satisfied the amount in controversy. Therefore, this Court concludes subject matter jurisdiction is lacking in this case, and the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 09/08/10. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
