v. Rentrop Tugs Inc
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 2, 2012
MEMORANDUM RULING granting in part and denying in part 124 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. More particularly, the motion is denied with regard to the defendant-towers request that the value of Rig 61 be fixed. The motion is granted with regar d to T. Moores request for damages resulting from its going out of business (Paragraph 36(d) of the complaint) and with regard to T. Moores request for damages arising from third party business interruption claims (Paragraph 36(F) of the complaint), and T. Moore will be barred from recovering damages in those categories. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 3/2/2012. (crt,Kennedy, T)
|March 17, 2011
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 83 Report and Recommendations: It is ORDERED that the 58 Motion to Dismiss the claim filed on behalf of Texon DistributingL P, which was filed by Transinland Marine Inc, Rentrop Tugs Inc, Mallard Towing L L C, T & R Tugs L L C and Dupre Marine Transportation Inc is hereby GRANTED and Texon's claim is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Tucker L Melancon on 3/17/2011. (crt,Smith, C)
|January 20, 2011
MEMORANDUM RULING AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that the United States 54 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 54 Motion to Lift or Modify Stay; 54 Motion to Consolidate Cases is GRANTED and the Clerk of this Court is to lift the stay in this consoli dated limitation action in order for the United States to file its complaint within 15 days of the entry of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon filing its complaint, the United States may file a motion to withdraw its claim in the limitation proceedings in this action [Rec. Doc. 38] and to consolidate its complaint with the previously consolidated actions herein. Signed by Judge Tucker L Melancon on 1/19/2011. (crt,Alexander, E) Modified text on 1/20/2011. (Alexander, E)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?