Simon v. Express Scripts Inc et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 31, 2014
JUDGMENT ADOPTING re 49 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the 44 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and the plaintiff's claims against Express Scripts, Inc., are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 1/31/14. (crt,Guidry, C)
|September 23, 2013
MEMORANDUM RULING This Court ADOPTS the re 38 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the 13 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims filed by Express Scripts Inc is GRANTED, and plaintiff's claims - couched as they are under state law- are DENIED AND DISMISSED, without prejudice to the plaintiff to amend her complaint to re-state her claims under ERISA. Consequently, the case is not closed at this juncture, for the reasons more fully discussed hereinabove. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff has ten (10) days from the date of this Ruing within which to amend her complaint to re-state her claims under ERISA. Should the plaintiff not filed here amended complaint within the prescribed period, the entirety of her complaint will be dismissed with prejudice, and this matter will be closed. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 9/23/13. (crt,Guidry, C)
|May 1, 2013
MEMORANDUM RULING denying 22 Motion to Remand. Evaluating subject-matter jurisdiction as of the time of removal, the undersigned concludes that the plaintiffs ERISA claim against Tower Life provided this Court with subject-matter jurisdiction base d on a federal question. Although the plaintiffs claims against Tower Life were dismissed, this Court continues to havesubject-matter jurisdiction over this action. Exercising permissible discretion, the undersigned declines to remand the action to state court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 5/1/13. (crt,Kennedy, T)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?