Romero v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Keena Hayes Romero
Defendant: U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number: 6:2013cv00243
Filed: January 31, 2013
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Lafayette Office
County: Acadia
Referring Judge: Patrick J Hanna
Presiding Judge: Richard T Haik
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 7, 2014 10 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 9 Report and Recommendations. It is hereby held the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard T Haik, Sr on 8/6/14. (crt,Jordan, P)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Romero v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Katherine W Vincent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keena Hayes Romero
Represented By: Stephen A Stefanski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?