Miller v. Harson et al
| Dale Miller |
| Louis Perret, Michael Harson and P Michot |
| 6:2014cv02410 |
| July 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| West Feliciana |
| Rebecca F Doherty |
| C Michael Hill |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER denying 10 Motion for Reconsideration re 9 Order on Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Michael Hill on 12/31/2014. (crt,GregorySld, C)
|
|
Filing
5
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 3 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that permission for Miller to pursue this action in forma pauperis is DENIED. Given that Miller has failed to pay this Court's full filing fee of $400.00 within fourteen (14) days of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Miller's civil rights action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 USC Section 1915(g). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 USC Section 1915(g), D ale Miller is barred from filing any future proceedings in this Court in forma pauperis, while incarcerated, unless he is in imminent danger or serious physical injury. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the Keeper of the Three Stirkes List, Tyler, Texas.. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 12/02/14. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
