Lantz v. Chevron Corp

Plaintiff: Craig Lantz
Defendant: Chevron Corp
Case Number: 6:2014cv02548
Filed: August 21, 2014
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Lafayette Office
County: Vermilion
Referring Judge: C Michael Hill
Presiding Judge: Richard T Haik
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29:1001
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 9, 2014 9 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant, Chevron Corporation and all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of personal jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Richard T Haik, Sr on 10/9/14. (crt,Roaix, G)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lantz v. Chevron Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig Lantz
Represented By: Douglas K Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chevron Corp
Represented By: Thomas J McGoey, II
Represented By: William Brian London
Represented By: Kindall Chauffe James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?