Coastal Commerce Bank v. S M Energy L L C et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 5, 2017
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 92 Report and Recommendations re 88 Bill of Costs. IT IS ORDERED that upon considering the Bill of Costs, the total judgment awarded on the Motion for Default Judgment of $4,050,431.24 is increased by the amount of $439,717.83, said additional amount representing the interest on the two promissory notes, late fees, and all costs. The total amount of the judgment is amended to $4,490,149.07. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 12/5/2017. (crt,Keifer, K)
|November 21, 2017
ORDER denying 66 Motion for Reconsideration re 62 Order on Motion to Set Aside Default. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol B Whitehurst on 11/21/2017. (crt,Chicola, C)
|October 5, 2017
PARTIAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT adopting in part and rejecting in part 70 Report and Recommendations; granting in part 46 Motion for Default Judgment against Lancon for the amount of $5,175,431.24 representing the principal indebtedness, less cre dit for the credit bids made by Coastal in the amount of $1,125,000.00, for a total judgment in the amount of $4,050,431.24. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff particularize the amounts that it claims to be owed as outlined in this judgme nt by November 6, 2017. FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Whitehurst to calculate the contractual interest, costs authorized according to the terms of the promissory notes, court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 10/5/2017. (crt,Keifer, K)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?