Jones v. Ensco Offshore Co
Jones Quanta |
Ensco Offshore Company |
6:2020cv00831 |
June 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Marine |
46 U.S.C. ยง 30104 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ensco Offshore Company with Jury Demand (Prepayment of fee not required pursuant to 28 USC 1916) filed by Jones Quanta. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Proposed summons/writ)(Attorney Ashley Spencer Gulden added to party Jones Quanta (pty:pla))(aty,Gulden, Ashley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Ensco Offshore Co | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jones Quanta | |
Represented By: | Ashley Spencer Gulden |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ensco Offshore Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.