Brasher v. Hearts of Hope et al
| Jaci Loveless Brasher |
| Kim Young, Sarah Lawton, Jency Olivier, John Doe, Matt Doucet, Jane Doe, Hearts of Hope and Lacy Pitre |
| 6:2024cv01373 |
| October 8, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Robert R Summerhays |
| Carol B Whitehurst |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Carol B Whitehurst. Magistrate Judge David J Ayo no longer assigned to case. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Carol B Whitehurst. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J Ayo on 10/17/2024. (crt,Thomas, T)
|
| CASE Assigned to Judge Robert R Summerhays and Magistrate Judge David J Ayo. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge David J Ayo. (crt,Thomas, T) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jaci Loveless Brasher. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 10/8/2024. (crt,Williams, K) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/9/2024: #1 Proposed order) (Thomas, T). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jane Doe, John Doe, Matt Doucet, Hearts of Hope, Sarah Lawton, Jency Olivier, Lacy Pitre, Kim Young with Jury Demand filed by Jaci Loveless Brasher. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(crt,Williams, K) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
