TURCOTTE v. LEPAGE
Plaintiff: MICHAEL P TURCOTTE
Defendant: PAUL R LEPAGE
Case Number: 1:2011cv00312
Filed: August 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Bangor Office
County: Kennebec
Presiding Judge: D. BROCK HORNBY
Presiding Judge: MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK
Nature of Suit: State Reapportionment
Cause of Action: 28:1343
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER ON AMENDED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - denying 20 Amended Motion for Reconsideration. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
January 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE - adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 11 Report and Recommendations for 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by PAUL R LEPAGE. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TURCOTTE v. LEPAGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAUL R LEPAGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL P TURCOTTE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?