FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION v. SILKMAN et al
| FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION |
| RICHARD SILKMAN and COMPETITIVE ENERGY SERVICES LLC |
| 1:2016cv00205 |
| April 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Bangor Office |
| XX Outside the State |
| JOHN C. NIVISON |
| JOHN A. WOODCOCK |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
185
ORDER ON MOTION TO EXCLUDE WITNESS denying 174 Motion to Exclude By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
|
|
Filing
162
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL denying 159 Motion for Leave to File By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT denying 133 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 134 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER denying 119 OBJECTION TO ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTES By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (ccs)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER granting 73 Motion for Complex Track Scheduling Order. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
66
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered directing transfer of this case to the District of Maine. (Woodlock, Douglas) (Main Document 66 replaced on 4/12/2016) (Colman, Claire). (Main Document 66 replaced on 4/12/2016) (Colman, Claire). [Transferred from Massachusetts on 4/13/2016.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
