JAMES v. BUENO et al
Plaintiff: MICHEAL J JAMES
Defendant: ERIC BUENO, RANDALL LIBERTY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK and JOY HALL
Case Number: 1:2016cv00416
Filed: August 15, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Bangor Office
County: Knox
Presiding Judge: JOHN C. NIVISON
Presiding Judge: NANCY TORRESEN
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE denying 63 Motion Request for Immediate Relief ; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 73 on 63 Motion for Immediate Relief filed by MICHEAL J JAMES By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (MMB)
December 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 73 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 63 MOTION Request for Immediate Relief filed by MICHEAL J JAMES. Objections to R&R due by 12/27/2016. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
November 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 32 MOTION to Dismiss filed by JOY HALL. Objections to R&R due by 11/21/2016. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
October 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 31 MOTION for Entry of Default filed by MICHEAL J JAMES. Objections to R&R due by 11/14/2016. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
October 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER denying 20 Motion for TRO; denying 20 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 26 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (MMB)
September 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 20 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by MICHEAL J JAMES. Objections to R&R due by 10/11/2016. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JAMES v. BUENO et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHEAL J JAMES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ERIC BUENO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RANDALL LIBERTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOSEPH FITZPATRICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOY HALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?