TUCK v. CITY OF GARDINER POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
| MICHAEL A TUCK |
| CITY OF GARDINER POLICE DEPARTMENT, TODD PILLSBURY, STACY BLAIR, DAVID TIMS, CITY OF GARDINER FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT, CENTRAL MAINE MEDICAL CENTER and KENNEBEC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH |
| 1:2018cv00212 |
| May 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Bangor Office |
| Kennebec |
| JON D. LEVY |
| JOHN H. RICH |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL granting 68 Motion to Dismiss. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (aks)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 56 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (akr)
|
|
Filing
56
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION recommending dismissal of 1 Complaint as to DAVID TIMMS, Objections to R&R due by 1/6/2020 By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (jwr)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO RECALL" DEFENDANT granting 37 Motion By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (akr) Modified on 7/29/2019 to correct date filed (akr).
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND KENNEBEC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH'S MOTION TO DISMISS granting 16 Motion for Leave to File; granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (akr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
