MUDIE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
| KIM MUDIE |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2021cv00133 |
| May 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| GEORGE Z SINGAL |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by TIMOTHY S. BOLEN on behalf of SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER (BOLEN, TIMOTHY)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (Attachments: #1 Attorney General Summons, #2 United Sates Attorney Summons)(lrt)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by KIM MUDIE (lrt)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET. (lrt)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, filed by KIM MUDIE. (Service of Process Deadline 8/12/2021)(lrt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
