UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $53,171 IN US CURRENCY
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| $53,171 IN US CURRENCY |
| CHAD BUBIER |
| 1:2021cv00358 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN H RICH |
| LANCE E WALKER |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting without objection #7 Motion to Stay through May 9, 2022. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (RICH III, JOHN)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Stay for 90 days through May 9, 2022 by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Responses due by 3/1/2022. (CLARK, DONALD) |
| Filing 6 CLAIM by CHAD BUBIER. (HESS, SCOTT) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by SCOTT F. HESS on behalf of CHAD BUBIER (HESS, SCOTT) |
| Set Answer Deadline for CHAD BUBIER: Answer due by 3/1/2022. (mmy) |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to $53,171 IN US CURRENCY served on 1/10/2022. (CLARK, DONALD) |
| Filing 3 WARRANT In Rem Issued By DEPUTY CLERK: Robert Allen. (bfa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against $53,171 IN US CURRENCY, filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Service of Process Deadline 3/14/2022)(bfa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/14/2021: #1 proposed warrant in-rem) (bfa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
