GREATER OMAHA PACKING COMPANY INC v. FAIRBANK RECONSTRUCTION CORP
Plaintiff: GREATER OMAHA PACKING COMPANY INC
Defendant: FAIRBANK RECONSTRUCTION CORP
Case Number: 2:2013cv00436
Filed: November 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Portland Office
County: XX Outside the State
Presiding Judge: JOHN H. RICH
Presiding Judge: GEORGE Z. SINGAL
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS granting 6 Motion to Dismiss By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GREATER OMAHA PACKING COMPANY INC v. FAIRBANK RECONSTRUCTION CORP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FAIRBANK RECONSTRUCTION CORP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GREATER OMAHA PACKING COMPANY INC
Represented By: DANIEL J. MITCHELL
Represented By: STEPHEN P ELLENBECKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?