BROWNE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
ALBION SAVAGE BROWNE |
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER SECURITY STAFF and MEDICAL STAFF AND PROVIDERS |
2:2016cv00619 |
December 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
Portland Office |
Cumberland |
JOHN C. NIVISON |
NANCY TORRESEN |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER denying 11 Motion to Extend Time; order affirming Report and Recommended Decision 13 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (MMB) |
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 11 MOTION to Extend Time to Further Amend Claim filed by ALBION SAVAGE BROWNE, 10 Amended Complaint filed by ALBION SAVAGE BROWNE. Objections to R&R due by 5/4/2017. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP) |
Filing 7 ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendations and DISMISSING the Plaintiffs claims against the Maine Department of Corrections and the Maine Correctional Center, and the Plaintiffs claim based on his work assignments. If the Plaintiff is satisfied w ith what he filed on February 3, 2017, serving as his amended complaint, the court will treat it as such. However, the court will permit the Plaintiff fourteen (14) additional days to amend his complaint further, if he wishes to do so. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (MMB) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 1 Complaint,, filed by ALBION SAVAGE BROWNE. Objections to R&R due by 2/1/2017. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.