AUSTIN v. HAMILTON et al

Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER AUSTIN
Defendant: MARK CRONIN, SCOTT STEITZ, RYAN FOSYTHER, YORK COUNTY, NICOLE MCLEOD and RICKER HAMILTON
Undetermined: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Case Number: 2:2018cv00285
Filed: July 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Portland Office
County: York
0 Judge: JOHN C NIVISON
1 Judge: GEORGE Z SINGAL
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by CHRISTOPHER AUSTIN (bfa) Modified on 7/25/2018 to correct filing date(bfa).
July 24, 2018 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) Modified on 7/25/2018 to correct filing date(bfa).
July 24, 2018 Filing 3 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS filed by CHRISTOPHER AUSTIN re #1 Complaint. Main Document: Assignment of Rights to Support. (Attachments: #1 Validation of debts, #2 Income Witholding for Support - Instructions, #3 Right of action, #4 Plaintiff and Defendant; Capacity; Public Officers, #5 income witholding orders, #6 Payments re: support order, #7 letter to Judge Nivison re: statement of claim, #8 letter to Jerry Joy - Child Support Customer Services, #9 State plan for child and spousal support, #10 statements by Plaintiff in support of claim, #11 Cooperative arrangements, #12 medical info, #13 check stubs, #14 Video on file in the Clerk's Office)(bfa) Modified on 8/13/2018 to correct filing date (bfa).
July 24, 2018 Filing 2 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS filed by CHRISTOPHER AUSTIN re #1 Complaint. Main Document: Federal Manuel of Child Support Enforcement. (Attachments: #1 Title 14: Court Procedure-Civil, #2 State Guidelines for Child Support Awards, #3 Requirement of Statutorily Prescribed Procedures to Improve Effectiveness of Child Support Enforcement, #4 State Plan for Child and Spousal Support, #5 Grants to States, #6 Cooperative Arrangements, #7 Paternity Disestablishment, #8 Expedited Processes, #9 ME Division of Support Enforcement and Recovery Procedures, #10 Payment to States, #11 State Plans for Chid Welfare Services, #12 Child Support and Establishment of Paternity, #13 USDOJ Civil Rights Division Memo, #14 Imprisonment for Debt, #15 Civil action for deprivation of rights, #16 Positive Law Codification, #17 Duties of the Secretary, #18 Requirement of statutorily prescribed procedures to improve effectiveness of child support enforcement, #19 State plan for child and spousal support)(bfa) Modified on 8/13/2018 to correct filing date (bfa).
July 24, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARK CRONIN, RYAN FOSYTHER, RICKER HAMILTON, NICOLE MCLEOD, SCOTT STEITZ, YORK COUNTY with Jury Demand, filed by CHRISTOPHER AUSTIN. (Service of Process Deadline 10/22/2018) (Attachments: #1 Mason v. Bradley, #2 Wehunt v. G Ledbetter, #3 Bonita v. New Jersey Department of Human Services, #4 Meyer v. Nebraska, #5 Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp, #6 Ward v. Village of Monroeville, #7 Tumey v. Ohio, #8 letter to Equifax, #9 letter to Transunion, #10 letter to Seal Rock Healthcare re: income witholding, #11 letter to Seal Rock Healthcare re: income witholding, #12 Interrogatory to ME DHHS, #13 Interrogatory to ME DHHS, #14 Interrogatory to ME DHHS, #15 definitions re: claimed debt, #16 Interrogatory to ME DHHS, #17 Interrogatory to ME DHHS, #18 response to claim of debt)(bfa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AUSTIN v. HAMILTON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK CRONIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCOTT STEITZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RYAN FOSYTHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: YORK COUNTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NICOLE MCLEOD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICKER HAMILTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER AUSTIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Undetermined: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?