TRUMAN v. KELLEY, et al
| PETER P TRUMAN |
| DANA KELLEY, LAUREN DALY, ANTHONY GERMAINE, DAVID HEMINGWAY, KATHRYN SLATTERY and MICHAEL DUDDY |
| 2:2020cv00108 |
| March 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN H RICH |
| JOHN A WOODCOCK |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service by PETER P TRUMAN. LAUREN DALY served on 4/16/2020; MICHAEL DUDDY served on 4/16/2020; ANTHONY GERMAINE served on 4/16/2020; DAVID HEMINGWAY served on 4/16/2020; DANA KELLEY served on 4/16/2020; KATHRYN SLATTERY served on 4/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(bfa) |
| Filing 6 LETTER from Clerk's Office providing Information for Pro Se Parties handout. (bfa) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by PETER P TRUMAN (bfa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Request for Discovery (bfa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Pro Se Appearance form filed by PETER P TRUMAN (bfa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LAUREN DALY, MICHAEL DUDDY, ANTHONY GERMAINE, DAVID HEMINGWAY, DANA KELLEY, KATHRYN SLATTERY with Jury Demand, filed by PETER P TRUMAN. (Service of Process Deadline 6/22/2020) (Attachments: #1 certificate of service, #2 envelope)(bfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
