DALGLISH et al v. ELDREDGE LUMBER AND HARDWARE INC et al
PRESTON DALGLISH and TERRY DALGLISH |
MARVIN LUMBER AND CEDAR CO, ELDREDGE LUMBER AND HARDWARE INC, MARVIN COMPANIES INC, MARVIN WINDOWS LLC, MARVIN LUMBER AND CEDAR CO doing business as MARVIN WINDOWS AND DOORS and ELDREDGE LUMBER AND HARDWARE INC doing business as MARVIN DESIGN GALLERY BY ELDREDGE |
2:2020cv00231 |
July 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
JOHN C NIVISON |
LANCE E WALKER |
Contract: Other |
15 U.S.C. § 2301 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 STATE COURT RECORD with Affidavit by MARVIN LUMBER AND CEDAR CO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court record)(GINZER, DAVID) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Extend Time to File State Court Record. Time is extended to July 16, 2020. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN) |
Reset Deadlines per ECF Order #10: State Court Record due by 7/16/2020. (meh) |
Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines as original was set in error - : Discovery due by 11/26/2020. (meh) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Extend time to File State Court Record by MARVIN LUMBER AND CEDAR CO Responses due by 7/30/2020. (GINZER, DAVID) Modified on 7/9/2020 to correct motion type (meh). |
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 7/30/2020. Written Notice of Intent to File Summary Judgment Motion and Request for Pre-Filing Conference due by 12/3/2020. Motions due by 12/17/2020. Ready for Trial on 3/1/2021. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (meh) |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by ELDREDGE LUMBER AND HARDWARE INC. (GINZER, DAVID) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MARVIN COMPANIES INC, MARVIN LUMBER AND CEDAR CO, MARVIN WINDOWS LLC. (GINZER, DAVID) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by MARVIN COMPANIES INC, MARVIN LUMBER AND CEDAR CO, MARVIN WINDOWS LLC.(GINZER, DAVID) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by ELDREDGE LUMBER AND HARDWARE INC.(GINZER, DAVID) |
Filing 3 PROCEDURAL ORDER RE: REMOVAL: State Court Record due by 7/9/2020. By DEPUTY CLERK: Robert Allen. (bfa) |
Set Answer Deadline for Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company : Answer due by 7/8/2020. (bfa) |
Filing Fee Paid via Credit Card ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AMEDC-2265180.), filed by MARVIN LUMBER AND CEDAR CO.(GINZER, DAVID) |
Set Deadlines : Per Local Rule 7.1 Notice of Interested Parties or Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 7/9/2020. (bfa) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Cumberland County Superior Court, case number PORSC CV 20-174. PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS., filed by MARVIN LUMBER AND CEDAR CO. (Service of Process Deadline 9/29/2020) Fee due by 7/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1 summons, notice regarding electronic service, complaint served on Marvin Lumber, #2 Exhibit A-2 summons, notice regarding electronic service, complaint served on Marvin Window LLC, #3 Exhibit A-3 summons, notice regarding electronic service, complaint served on Marvin Companies, #4 Exhibit A-4 acceptance of service, #5 Exhibit B Quote from Eldridge, #6 Exhibit C list price document from Marvin, #7 Exhibit D repair quote)(bfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.