ORMSBY v. STATE OF MAINE
| THAYNE ORMSBY |
| STATE OF MAINE |
| MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES |
| 2:2020cv00319 |
| September 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| NANCY TORRESEN |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Extend Time to File Reply in Support of Section 2254 Petition. Time is extended to November 2, 2020. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
|
| Reset Deadlines as to #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Per Order #5: Reply deadline reset to 11/2/2020. (mnd) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time to File Response to Motion to Dismiss by THAYNE ORMSBY Responses due by 11/6/2020. (TZOVARRAS, HUNTER) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER/RESPONSE/REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by STATE OF MAINE. Reply due by 10/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Record (docket sheets))(MACOMBER, DONALD) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO ANSWER #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Responses due by 11/9/2020. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by THAYNE ORMSBY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Order denying Certificate of Probable Cause, #2 Exhibit B - Post Conviction Review Decision, #3 Exhibit C - Supreme Judicial Court of Maine affirming judgment and sentences)(bfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
