ATKINSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Plaintiff: CHRISTINE D ATKINSON
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Not Classified By Court: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 2:2023cv00021
Filed: January 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Presiding Judge: JOHN C NIVISON
Referring Judge: GEORGE Z SINGAL
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2023 Filing 8 PROCEDURAL ORDER: Social Security Brief due by 4/10/2023. Ready for SS Oral Argument the week of 6/12/2023. By DEPUTY CLERK: J. Driscoll. (jgd)
March 10, 2023 Filing 7 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (Social Security Appeal) filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. Supp. Soc. Sec. R. 4(b) by SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER. (Attachments: #1 Court Transcript Index, #2 Documents Related to Administrative Process (R. 1-73), #3 Payment Documents and Decisions (R. 74-97), #4 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices (R. 98-204), #5 Non Disability Related Development (R. 205-227), #6 Disability Related Development (R. 228-316), #7 Medical Records (R. 317-418))(BOLEN, TIMOTHY)
January 11, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by TIMOTHY S. BOLEN on behalf of SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER (BOLEN, TIMOTHY)
January 11, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Service: AUSA ANDREW K. LIZOTTE has been added to the docket for service and notice purposes only. Pursuant to Social Security Supplemental Rule 3, the Court has electronically sent notice to the United States Attorney for the District of Maine that a Complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security was filed in this case. Pursuant to Social Security Supplemental Rule 4 the Commissioner's Answer is due within 60 days after notice. Answer due by 3/13/2023. (lrt)
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
January 10, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by CHRISTINE D ATKINSON (lrt)
January 10, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (lrt)
January 10, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, filed by CHRISTINE D ATKINSON.(lrt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ATKINSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHRISTINE D ATKINSON
Represented By: RILEY L. FENNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Represented By: TIMOTHY S. BOLEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Represented By: ANDREW K. LIZOTTE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?