BOYLE v. YELLEN et al
| WILLIAM BOYLE |
| JANET YELLEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and HIMAMAULI DAS |
| 2:2024cv00081 |
| March 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| LANCE E WALKER |
| KAREN FRINK WOLF |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Conference of Counsel. The Clerk is requested to set a videoconference with counsel. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN FRINK WOLF. (WOLF, KAREN)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (clp)
|
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint , Joint MOTION for Conference of Counsel Under Rule 16(b) ( Responses due by 5/31/2024.) by HIMAMAULI DAS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, JANET YELLEN (ROBINSON, STUART) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by STUART ROBINSON on behalf of All Defendants (ROBINSON, STUART) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Docket Entry Modification regarding #6 Certified Mail Returned, #5 Certified Mail Returned, #4 Certified Mail Returned: These docket entries were modified to correct event used from Acknowledgement of Service to Certified Mail Returned, and correct date service was returned. (mmy) |
| Set Answer Deadline Regarding Certified Mail Services for JANET YELLEN and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY: Answer due by 5/17/2024. (mmy) |
| Set Deadlines: Check for Filing of a Motion for Default as to HIMAMAULI DAS on 5/17/2024. (mmy) |
| Filing 6 Certified Mail Service Returned as to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY on 3/18/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proof of service on US Attorney, #2 Proof of service on AG of US)(ROSENTHAL, DANIEL) Modified on 4/17/2024 to correct service event used and date service was returned (mmy). |
| Filing 5 Certified Mail Service Returned as to JANET YELLEN on 3/18/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proof of service on AG of US, #2 Proof of service on US Attorney)(ROSENTHAL, DANIEL) Modified on 4/17/2024 to correct service event used and date service was returned (mmy). |
| Filing 4 Certified Mail Service Returned as to HIMAMAULI DAS on 3/25/2024. (ROSENTHAL, DANIEL) Modified on 4/17/2024 to correct service event used (mmy). |
| Filing 3 Summonses Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (Attachments: #1 Summons to United States Department of the Treasury, #2 Summons to Merrick Garland, #3 Summons Himamauli Das, #4 Summons United States Attorney, District of Maine)(cjd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (cjd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS., filed by WILLIAM BOYLE. (Service of Process Deadline 6/13/2024) Fee due by 3/18/2024.(cjd) |
| Filing Fee Paid via Credit Card ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMEDC-2927949.), filed by WILLIAM BOYLE.(ROSENTHAL, DANIEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
