TORRE v. STATE OF MAINE
| VINCENT TORRE, JR |
| STATE OF MAINE |
| MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES |
| 2:2025cv00118 |
| March 31, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Maine |
| Portland Office |
| NANCY TORRESEN |
| KAREN FRINK WOLF |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RECOMMENDED DISMISSAL re #1 Complaint. Objections to R&R due by 4/15/2025. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN FRINK WOLF. (MGW) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE: Recently VINCENT TORRE, JR filed a pleading in this Court without representation of an attorney. Information regarding representing yourself is available on the Court's website at #https://www.med.uscourts.gov/handout-self-represented-parties including a Handout for Self-Represented Parties. This handout is intended for informational and practical purposes only and in no way takes the place of an attorney's legal advice, but it may provide some answers to procedural and general questions. ALSO NOTE: You are responsible for notifying the Court in writing of any changes to your mailing address or telephone number and of any change in status regarding representation by an attorney. (cc: pro se litigant) (jlm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STATE OF MAINE, filed by VINCENT TORRE, JR. (Service of Process Deadline 6/30/2025) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jlm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
