Gale v. Ramar Moving Systems, Inc.

Defendant: Ramar Moving Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Gale
Case Number: 1:2013cv00487
Filed: February 14, 2013
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Frederick
Presiding Judge: Catherine C. Blake
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 3, 2013 15 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 10 Motion to Remand to State Court; granting 13 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 4/3/2013. (aos, Deputy Clerk)
July 16, 2013 21 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 7/16/2013. (aos, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gale v. Ramar Moving Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ramar Moving Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Colin Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Gale
Represented By: Matthew Strohm Evans, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.