LPS Default Solutions, Inc. v. Friedman & MacFadyen P.A.

Defendant: Friedman & Macfadyen, P.A.
Plaintiff: LPS Default Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00794
Filed: March 14, 2013
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Baltimore County
Presiding Judge: William D Quarles
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 2, 2013 24 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 10 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Money Judgment filed by LPS Default Solutions, Inc.; Objections to R&R due by 8/19/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K. Gauvey on 8/2/13. (dass, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LPS Default Solutions, Inc. v. Friedman & MacFadyen P.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Friedman & Macfadyen, P.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LPS Default Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Paul Sweeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.