Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Plaintiff: Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.
Defendant: Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Case Number: 1:2015cv01745
Filed: June 15, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Richard D Bennett
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard D Bennett on 3/8/2016. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.
Represented By: Nicole Lefcourt Campbell
Represented By: Roger Cavenaugh Jones
Represented By: Lucas Farinato Webster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Represented By: Patrick Sheridan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?