Gordon v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
Plaintiff: Janvier S Gordon
Defendant: Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2017cv00559
Filed: February 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Frederick
Presiding Judge: George Levi Russell
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 3 MOTION to Dismiss WITH PREJUDICE, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING SUBMISSION TO MANDATORY ARBITRATION. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 11/30/2017. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gordon v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janvier S Gordon
Represented By: Cedar P Carlton
Represented By: Bruce A Fredrickson
Represented By: Geoffrey Howard Simpson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?