Zettelmeier v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Plaintiff: Kenneth A. Zettelmeier
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Inc.
Case Number: 1:2017cv02244
Filed: August 9, 2017
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Baltimore Office
County: 99999
Presiding Judge: Catherine C. Blake
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 9, 2017 3 Opinion or Order of the Court Certified Copy of Conditional Transfer Order. Case closed. Signed by Clerk of the Panel Jeffery N. Luthi on 8/7/2017. (kwf)
August 7, 2017 2 Opinion or Order of the Court Conditional Transfer Order (Copy). Signed by Clerk of the Panel Jeffery N. Luthi on 8/7/2017. (kwf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zettelmeier v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth A. Zettelmeier
Represented By: Alex C Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Inc.
Represented By: Terri Steinhaus Reiskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?