White v. Warden

Petitioner: Robert Armstrong White
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 1:2018cv01969
Filed: June 28, 2018
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Allegany
Presiding Judge: Richard D Bennett
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
June 28, 2018 5 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - CJA 23 by Robert Armstrong White(bas, Deputy Clerk)
June 28, 2018 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Robert Armstrong White(bas, Deputy Clerk)
June 28, 2018 3 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing by Robert Armstrong White (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law)(bas, Deputy Clerk)
June 28, 2018 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Armstrong White(bas, Deputy Clerk)
June 28, 2018 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Robert Armstrong White.(bas, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Armstrong White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By: Daniel John Jawor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?