Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Performance Contracting, Inc.
| Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund |
| Performance Contracting, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv02055 |
| July 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| Howard |
| James K Bredar |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING case with each party to bear its own costs unless otherwise agreed without prejudice to the right of a party to move for good cause to reopen this action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 9/4/2018. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 8 Status Report Submitted Requesting Temporary Dismissal for Period of 30 Days Pending Settlement to Allow Time for Check to Clear by Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund (Gilligan, Charles) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER setting deadline for Plaintiff to file/serve a motion for entry of default or provide a report as to why such motion is inappropriate. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 8/31/2018. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Performance Contracting, Inc. answer due 8/28/2018. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 8/2/2018. (bpgs, Chambers)
|
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Performance Contracting, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Niccolini, Robert) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund. Performance Contracting, Inc. served on 7/17/2018, answer due 8/7/2018.(Gilligan, Charles) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to Performance Contracting, Inc.(dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund (Gilligan, Charles) (Modified to remove erroneous ex parte security per counsel on 7/9/2018) (dass, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Performance Contracting, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7430091.), filed by Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Gilligan, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Performance Contracting, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Performance Contracting, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Robert Ross Niccolini |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund | |
| Represented By: | Charles W Gilligan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
