Lane v. Berryhill
Kawani Tiffany Lane |
Nancy A. Berryhill |
SSA Notify |
1:2018cv02420 |
August 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Baltimore Office |
Cecil |
Stephanie A Gallagher |
George Levi Russell |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Magistrate Judge by Vickie LeDuc on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued 60 days as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 8/10/2018. (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Paperless order referring case to Magistrate Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher for pretrial management and report and recommendations pursuant to Standing Order 2014-01. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 8/9/2018. (jnls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Theodore Anthony Melanson on behalf of Kawani Tiffany Lane (Melanson, Theodore) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kawani Tiffany Lane(Raab, Frederick) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Kawani Tiffany Lane. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Raab, Frederick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.