Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company v. Olszewski et al
| Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company |
| Charles Blair Phillips, Kevin T. Olszewski, Law Office of Kevin T. Olszewski, P.A. and Kevin T. Olszewski, Esquire |
| 1:2018cv03017 |
| October 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Ellen L Hollander |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
MARGINAL ORDER approving #3 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 10/12/18. (krs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company (Brennan, Stephan) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Law Office of Kevin T. Olszewski, P.A., Kevin T. Olszewski, Esquire, Charles Blair Phillips.(krs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7592215.), filed by Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Complaint, #4 Summons Summons to Kevin T. Olszewski, Esquire, #5 Summons Summons to Law Office of Kevin T. Olszewski, P.A., #6 Summons Summons to Charles Blair Phillips)(Brennan, Stephan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
