Little v. Jones et al
| Lawrence Little |
| Jerome Jones and Donald E. Terry, Jr. |
| 1:2018cv03984 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Ellen L Hollander |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER granting (2) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in case ELH-18-3983; consolidating ELH-18-3984 and ELH-18-3985 under ELH-18-3983; closing ELH-18-3984 and ELH-18-3985; granting plaintiff 21 days from the date of this order to complete forms, summons and return to Clerk with service copies. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 1/3/2019. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-03983-ELH, 1:18-cv-03984-ELH (c/m 1/4/19 jnls, Deputy Clerk)
|
| THIS IS A CONSOLIDATED CASE. PLEASE DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE OR SPREAD TEXT IN THIS CASE. ALL SUBSEQUENT PLEADINGS ARE TO BE ELECTRONICALLY FILED ONLY IN THE LEAD CASE (ELH-18-3983). (jnls, Deputy Clerk) |
| Cases associated: Create association to 1:18-cv-03983-ELH. (jnls, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lawrence Little(slss, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jerome Jones and Donald E. Terry, Jr., filed by Lawrence Little. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(slss, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
